AI Governance Engineer
GitHub

G7 Hiroshima Code action 3: public reporting of capabilities and limitations

Publicly report capabilities, limitations and appropriate and inappropriate uses; the OECD reporting framework has collected such reports since 2025

By Reviewed

From clause to evidenceThe chain from G7 Code Action 3 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: G7 Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems, Action 3ClauseG7 CodeAction 3Duty holder: Organisations developing advanced AI systemsDuty holderOrganisationsdeveloping…Applies from: no date (Voluntary)Applies fromNo dateVoluntaryArtefact: Model card published from the registryArtefactModel cardpublished…Layer: Layer 02 Inventory & TransparencyLayerLayer 02Inventory &TransparencyEvidence record: the common evidence record (Evidence record v1)Evidence recordEvidence recordv1Same topic in 18 frameworks (44 clauses): EU AI Act, ISO 42001, China AI Labelling, China GenAI Measures, China DeepSynthesis, GPAI Code, GDPR and 11 moreAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from G7 Code Action 3 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: G7 Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems, Action 3ClauseG7 Code · Action 3Duty holder: Organisations developing advanced AI systemsDuty holderOrganisations developing advanced…Applies from: no date (Voluntary)Applies fromNo date · VoluntaryArtefact: Model card published from the registryArtefactModel card published…Layer: Layer 02 Inventory & TransparencyLayerLayer 02Inventory & TransparencyEvidence record: the common evidence record (Evidence record v1)Evidence recordEvidence record v1Same topic in 18 frameworks (44 clauses): EUAI Act, ISO 42001, China AI Labelling, ChinaGenAI Measures, China Deep Synthesis and 13…As of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-G7-A3. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: G7 Code, Action 3.
  • Duty holder: Organisations developing advanced AI….
  • Applies from: No date, Voluntary.
  • Artefact: Model card published….
  • Layer: Layer 02 Inventory & Transparency.
  • Evidence record: Evidence record v1.
  • Record schema: Evidence record.
  • The same topic in 18 other frameworks; the crosswalk section below links each clause.
Id
AIGE-OBL-G7-A3
Instrument
G7 Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems code
Clause
Action 3
In scope
Organisations developing advanced AI systems
Applies from
No date Voluntary · agreed 2023-10-30

The artefact that evidences it

Model card published from the registry.

What this obligation connects toG7 Code Action 3 and its 18 relations: 18 same crosswalk topic.DirectG7 Code Action 3Same crosswalk topic (18)AI Verify 1.1.6, 1.7.2, 1.1.1 · Core clauseAI VerifyCSA AICM MDS-03, MDS-04 · Core clauseCSA AICMChina AI Labelling Label Art. 4, Label Art. 5 · Core clauseChina AI LabellingChina Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 16, DeepSyn Art. 17 · Core clauseChina Deep SynthesisChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 12, GenAI Art. 19 · Core clauseChina GenAI MeasuresCoE Convention CoE Art. 14(2), CoE Art. 15(2) · Core clauseCoE Convention+12 more+12 more: EU AI Act Art. 11, Art. 13, Art. 53, Art. 50, Art. 86, Art. 18, Art. 43, Art. 53(1)(d), Art. 50(2), 50(4), GAO AI Accountability 1.9, 3.5, 1.7, GDPR Arts. 13–14, Art. 30, GPAI Code Transparency 1.1, Transparency 1.2, ISO 42001 7.5, A.6, A.8, Korea AI Act Art. 31, Art. 34(1)(2), OECD AI Principles OECD 1.3, Singapore GenAI GenAI 3, UK ATRS ATRS Tier 1, ATRS 2.2, China Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 16, GB/T 45654 GB/T 45654 Content labelling, NIST AI RMF MAP 1, MEASURE 2.8, MAP 1.6, MEASURE 2.9
What this obligation connects toG7 Code Action 3 and its 18 relations: 18 same crosswalk topic.DirectSame crosswalk topic (18)AI Verify 1.1.6, 1.7.2, 1.1.1 · Core clauseAI VerifyCSA AICM MDS-03, MDS-04 · Core clauseCSA AICMChina AI Labelling Label Art. 4, Label Art. 5 · Core clauseChina AI LabellingChina Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 16, DeepSyn Art. 17 · Core clauseChina Deep SynthesisChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 12, GenAI Art. 19 · Core clauseChina GenAI MeasuresCoE Convention CoE Art. 14(2), CoE Art. 15(2) · Core clauseCoE Convention+12 more+12 more: EU AI Act Art. 11, Art. 13, Art. 53, Art. 50, Art. 86, Art. 18, Art. 43, Art. 53(1)(d), Art. 50(2), 50(4), GAO AI Accountability 1.9, 3.5, 1.7, GDPR Arts. 13–14, Art. 30, GPAI Code Transparency 1.1, Transparency 1.2, ISO 42001 7.5, A.6, A.8, Korea AI Act Art. 31, Art. 34(1)(2), OECD AI Principles OECD 1.3, Singapore GenAI GenAI 3, UK ATRS ATRS Tier 1, ATRS 2.2, China Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 16, GB/T 45654 GB/T 45654 Content labelling, NIST AI RMF MAP 1, MEASURE 2.8, MAP 1.6, MEASURE 2.9G7 Code Action 3
What this obligation connects to Solid edges are direct relations, dashed ones looser (a case that cites the same article, a framework whose clauses only touch the topic); patterns and controls take the colour of their stack layer. Select a node to open it; the lists below give every relation in full.
Data table: every relation
Relations of AIGE-OBL-G7-A3
FamilyItemRelation
Same crosswalk topicAI Verify 1.1.6, 1.7.2, 1.1.1Core clause
Same crosswalk topicCSA AICM MDS-03, MDS-04Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina AI Labelling Label Art. 4, Label Art. 5Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 16, DeepSyn Art. 17Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 12, GenAI Art. 19Core clause
Same crosswalk topicCoE Convention CoE Art. 14(2), CoE Art. 15(2)Core clause
Same crosswalk topicEU AI Act Art. 11, Art. 13, Art. 53, Art. 50, Art. 86, Art. 18, Art. 43, Art. 53(1)(d), Art. 50(2), 50(4)Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGAO AI Accountability 1.9, 3.5, 1.7Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGDPR Arts. 13–14, Art. 30Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGPAI Code Transparency 1.1, Transparency 1.2Core clause
Same crosswalk topicISO 42001 7.5, A.6, A.8Core clause
Same crosswalk topicKorea AI Act Art. 31, Art. 34(1)(2)Core clause
Same crosswalk topicOECD AI Principles OECD 1.3Core clause
Same crosswalk topicSingapore GenAI GenAI 3Core clause
Same crosswalk topicUK ATRS ATRS Tier 1, ATRS 2.2Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 16Related clause
Same crosswalk topicGB/T 45654 GB/T 45654 Content labellingRelated clause
Same crosswalk topicNIST AI RMF MAP 1, MEASURE 2.8, MAP 1.6, MEASURE 2.9Related clause

Patterns that build it

No pattern in the catalogue names this clause on its "Maps to" line yet; the artefact above is the engineering answer.

The same topic in other frameworks

From the topic crosswalk: the clauses filed under the same topics as this one. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.

Documentation and transparency

Source

Chapter 08, section Treaty and international soft law, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). G7 Hiroshima Code action 3: public reporting of capabilities and limitations (AIGE-OBL-G7-A3). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-g7-a3. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{G7 Hiroshima Code action 3: public reporting of capabilities and limitations (AIGE-OBL-G7-A3)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-g7-a3},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}