G7 Hiroshima Code action 7: content authentication and provenance

Deploy content authentication and provenance mechanisms where feasible

From clause to evidenceThe chain from G7 Code Action 7 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: G7 Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems, Action 7ClauseG7 CodeAction 7Duty holder: Organisations developing advanced AI systemsDuty holderOrganisationsdeveloping…Applies from: no date (Voluntary)Applies fromNo dateVoluntaryArtefact: Provenance marking at output; verification testArtefactProvenancemarking at…Layer: Layer 04 Runtime Controls & ObservabilityLayerLayer 04Runtime Controls& ObservabilityEvidence record: the common evidence record (Evidence record v1)Evidence recordEvidence recordv1Same topic in 9 frameworks (14 clauses): EU AI Act, Korea AI Act, Singapore GenAI, China AI Labelling, China DeepSynthesis, AI Verify, CSA AICM and 2 moreAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from G7 Code Action 7 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: G7 Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems, Action 7ClauseG7 Code · Action 7Duty holder: Organisations developing advanced AI systemsDuty holderOrganisations developing advanced…Applies from: no date (Voluntary)Applies fromNo date · VoluntaryArtefact: Provenance marking at output; verification testArtefactProvenance marking at outputLayer: Layer 04 Runtime Controls & ObservabilityLayerLayer 04Runtime Controls & ObservabilityEvidence record: the common evidence record (Evidence record v1)Evidence recordEvidence record v1Same topic in 9 frameworks (14 clauses): EUAI Act, Korea AI Act, Singapore GenAI, ChinaAI Labelling, China Deep Synthesis and 4…As of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-G7-A7. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: G7 Code, Action 7.
  • Duty holder: Organisations developing advanced AI….
  • Applies from: No date, Voluntary.
  • Artefact: Provenance marking at output.
  • Layer: Layer 04 Runtime Controls & Observability.
  • Evidence record: Evidence record v1.
  • Record schema: Evidence record.
  • The same topic in 9 other frameworks; the crosswalk section below links each clause.
Id
AIGE-OBL-G7-A7
Instrument
G7 Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems code
Clause
Action 7
In scope
Organisations developing advanced AI systems
Applies from
No date Voluntary · agreed 2023-10-30

The artefact that evidences it

Provenance marking at output; verification test.

What this obligation connects to Solid edges are direct relations, dashed ones looser (a case that cites the same article, a framework whose clauses only touch the topic); patterns and controls take the colour of their stack layer. Select a node to open it; the lists below give every relation in full.
Data table: every relation
Relations of AIGE-OBL-G7-A7
FamilyItemRelation
Same crosswalk topicAI Verify 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 1.1.3Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina AI Labelling Label Art. 4, Label Art. 5Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 17Core clause
Same crosswalk topicEU AI Act Art. 50(2), Art. 50(4), Art. 3(60)Core clause
Same crosswalk topicKorea AI Act Art. 31Core clause
Same crosswalk topicSingapore GenAI GenAI 7Core clause
Same crosswalk topicCSA AICM MDS-09Related clause
Same crosswalk topicChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 12Related clause
Same crosswalk topicOWASP LLM LLM07:2026Related clause

Patterns that build it

No pattern in the catalogue names this clause on its "Maps to" line yet; the artefact above is the engineering answer.

The same topic in other frameworks

From the topic crosswalk: the clauses filed under the same topics as this one. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.

Source

Chapter 08, section Treaty and international soft law, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). G7 Hiroshima Code action 7: content authentication and provenance (AIGE-OBL-G7-A7). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-g7-a7. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{G7 Hiroshima Code action 7: content authentication and provenance (AIGE-OBL-G7-A7)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-g7-a7},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}