AI Governance Engineer
GitHub

EU AI Act Art. 73(6): incident investigation without altering the system

After reporting a serious incident the provider investigates without delay (risk assessment, corrective action) and does not alter the system in a way that may affect the evaluation of causes before informing the authorities

By Reviewed

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 73(6) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI ActArt. 73Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefactEvidence-preservationstepLayersLayer 04Layer 05Evidence recordAI incidentrecordSame topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topic files this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 73(6) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 73Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefactEvidence-preservation stepLayersLayer 04Layer 05Evidence recordAI incident recordSame topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topicfiles this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73-6. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 73.
  • Duty holder: Provider.
  • Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
  • Artefact: Evidence-preservation step.
  • Layers: Layer 04, Layer 05.
  • Evidence record: AI incident record.
  • Record schemas: AI incident record .
  • No crosswalk topic files this clause yet.
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73-6
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 73(6)
Duty holder
Provider
Authority
National MSA
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III
Later dates
  • Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
  • Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

Evidence-preservation step: model, prompt, policy and retrieval-index snapshots; sealed traces; fix shipped on a new version.

Patterns that build it

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 73(6): incident investigation without altering the system (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73-6). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73-6. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 73(6): incident investigation without altering the system (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73-6)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73-6},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}