AI Governance Engineer
GitHub

EU AI Act Art. 75(1a): serious incidents reported to the AI Office

Providers of high-risk systems under the AI Office's exclusive competence (systems built on their own GPAI model, and systems in designated very large online platforms or search engines) report serious incidents to the AI Office, with Art. 73(2) to (9) applying mutatis mutandis

By Reviewed

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 75(1a) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI ActArt. 75Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefactIncidentpipeline…LayersLayer 02Layer 05Evidence recordEvidence recordv1Same topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topic files this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 75(1a) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 75Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefactIncident pipeline routing…LayersLayer 02Layer 05Evidence recordEvidence record v1Same topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topicfiles this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART75-1A. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 75.
  • Duty holder: Provider.
  • Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
  • Artefact: Incident pipeline routing….
  • Layers: Layer 02, Layer 05.
  • Evidence record: Evidence record v1.
  • Record schema: Evidence record.
  • No crosswalk topic files this clause yet.
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART75-1A
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 75(1a)
Duty holder
Provider (systems under AI Office competence)
Authority
AI Office
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III; new by the Omnibus (reading, to be confirmed)
Later dates
  • Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
  • Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

Incident pipeline routing by a registry competence flag (national MSA or AI Office).

Patterns that build it

No pattern in the catalogue names this clause on its "Maps to" line yet; the artefact above is the engineering answer.

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 75(1a): serious incidents reported to the AI Office (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART75-1A). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art75-1a. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 75(1a): serious incidents reported to the AI Office (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART75-1A)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art75-1a},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}