EU AI Act Art. 73: serious-incident reporting

Serious-incident reporting for high-risk systems, on the deadlines of chapter 08's reporting-clock table

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 73 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: EU AI Act (post-Omnibus), Art. 73ClauseEU AI ActArt. 73Duty holder: ProviderDuty holderProviderApplies from: 2027-12-02 (Deferred)Applies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefact: Incident detection and triage pipeline; reporting-clock automation; evidence captureArtefactIncidentdetection and…Layers: Layer 05 Assurance & Continuous Compliance and Layer 04 Runtime Controls & ObservabilityLayersLayer 05Layer 04Evidence record: AI incident recordEvidence recordAI incidentrecordSame topic in 15 frameworks (33 clauses): EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, TC260 Framework 3.0, China GenAI Measures,GPAI Code, GDPR and 8 moreAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 73 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: EU AI Act (post-Omnibus), Art. 73ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 73Duty holder: ProviderDuty holderProviderApplies from: 2027-12-02 (Deferred)Applies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefact: Incident detection and triage pipeline; reporting-clock automation; evidence captureArtefactIncident detection and triage…Layers: Layer 05 Assurance & Continuous Compliance and Layer 04 Runtime Controls & ObservabilityLayersLayer 05Layer 04Evidence record: AI incident recordEvidence recordAI incident recordSame topic in 15 frameworks (33 clauses): EUAI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, TC260Framework 3.0, China GenAI Measures and 10…As of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 73.
  • Duty holder: Provider.
  • Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
  • Artefact: Incident detection and triage….
  • Layers: Layer 05, Layer 04.
  • Evidence record: AI incident record.
  • Record schemas: AI incident record .
  • The same topic in 15 other frameworks; the crosswalk section below links each clause.
When this obligation applies3 dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73 on a time axis, against its review date 2026-09-24.2024202620282030As of 2026-09-242027-12-02 · DeferredAnnex III2028-08-02 · High-risk(Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded(product safety-component)systems2030-08-02 · Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risksystems intended for use bypublic authorities (Art.111(2))2027-12-02 · Deferred · Annex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I) · Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems2030-08-02 · Later step · Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))Source: Obligation register(chapter 08)
When this obligation applies3 dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73 on a time axis, against its review date 2026-09-24.2027-12-02 · DeferredAnnex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded(product safety-component)systems2030-08-02 · Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risksystems intended for use by publicauthorities (Art. 111(2))2024202620282030As of 2026-09-242027-12-02 · Deferred · Annex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I) · Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems2030-08-02 · Later step · Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))Source: Obligation register (chapter 08)
When this obligation applies The first date in the row's status, then each later step: filled once its date has passed, outlined while it is still ahead of the review date.
Data table: the dates
Dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73
DateStepDetail
2027-12-02DeferredAnnex III
2028-08-02High-risk (Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
2030-08-02Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 73
Duty holder
Provider
Authority
National MSA
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III
Later dates
  • Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
  • Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

Incident detection and triage pipeline; reporting-clock automation; evidence capture.

What this obligation connects toEU AI Act Art. 73 and its 18 relations: 1 patterns, 2 open controls, 15 same crosswalk topic.DirectColour: stack layer of the pattern or control05 AssuranceEU AI Act Art. 73Patterns (1)Incident Pipeline · DirectIncident PipelineOpen controls (2)AIGE-CTL-EVAL-007 Incident Evidence Preservation · DirectIncident Evidence PreservationAIGE-CTL-DEPLOY-011 Serious incident reporting clocks · DirectSerious incident reporting clocksSame crosswalk topic (15)AI Verify 9.5.4, 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 5.11.1 · Core clauseAI VerifyCSA AICM SEF-07, SEF-08 · Core clauseCSA AICMChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 14, GenAI Art. 15 · Core clauseChina GenAI MeasuresEU AI Act Art. 72, Art. 26(5), Art. 55, Art. 3(49), Art. 20 · Core clauseEU AI ActG7 Code G7 Action 2, G7 Action 4 · Core clauseG7 CodeGAO AI Accountability 4.1, 4.2 · Core clauseGAO AI Accountability+9 more+9 more: GDPR Arts. 33–34, GPAI Code Safety C9, Safety 3.5, ISO 42001 A.8, 10.2, Korea AI Act Art. 32(1), NIST AI RMF MANAGE 4, MANAGE 4.3, MANAGE 2.4, GOVERN 4.3, Singapore Agentic Agentic 2.3.3, Singapore GenAI GenAI 4, TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 5.3.7, TC260 5.3.18, TC260 App. 2 II.6, China Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7
What this obligation connects toEU AI Act Art. 73 and its 18 relations: 1 patterns, 2 open controls, 15 same crosswalk topic.DirectColour: stack layer of the pattern or control05 AssurancePatterns (1)Incident Pipeline · DirectIncident PipelineSame crosswalk topic (15)AI Verify 9.5.4, 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 5.11.1 · Core clauseAI VerifyCSA AICM SEF-07, SEF-08 · Core clauseCSA AICMChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 14, GenAI Art. 15 · Core clauseChina GenAI MeasuresEU AI Act Art. 72, Art. 26(5), Art. 55, Art. 3(49), Art. 20 · Core clauseEU AI ActG7 Code G7 Action 2, G7 Action 4 · Core clauseG7 CodeGAO AI Accountability 4.1, 4.2 · Core clauseGAO AI Accountability+9 more+9 more: GDPR Arts. 33–34, GPAI Code Safety C9, Safety 3.5, ISO 42001 A.8, 10.2, Korea AI Act Art. 32(1), NIST AI RMF MANAGE 4, MANAGE 4.3, MANAGE 2.4, GOVERN 4.3, Singapore Agentic Agentic 2.3.3, Singapore GenAI GenAI 4, TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 5.3.7, TC260 5.3.18, TC260 App. 2 II.6, China Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7Open controls (2)AIGE-CTL-EVAL-007 Incident Evidence Preservation · DirectIncident Evidence PreservationAIGE-CTL-DEPLOY-011 Serious incident reporting clocks · DirectSerious incident reporting clocksEU AI Act Art. 73
What this obligation connects to Solid edges are direct relations, dashed ones looser (a case that cites the same article, a framework whose clauses only touch the topic); patterns and controls take the colour of their stack layer. Select a node to open it; the lists below give every relation in full.
Data table: every relation
Relations of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73
FamilyItemRelation
PatternsIncident PipelineDirect
Open controlsAIGE-CTL-EVAL-007 Incident Evidence PreservationDirect
Open controlsAIGE-CTL-DEPLOY-011 Serious incident reporting clocksDirect
Same crosswalk topicAI Verify 9.5.4, 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 5.11.1Core clause
Same crosswalk topicCSA AICM SEF-07, SEF-08Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 14, GenAI Art. 15Core clause
Same crosswalk topicEU AI Act Art. 72, Art. 26(5), Art. 55, Art. 3(49), Art. 20Core clause
Same crosswalk topicG7 Code G7 Action 2, G7 Action 4Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGAO AI Accountability 4.1, 4.2Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGDPR Arts. 33–34Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGPAI Code Safety C9, Safety 3.5Core clause
Same crosswalk topicISO 42001 A.8, 10.2Core clause
Same crosswalk topicKorea AI Act Art. 32(1)Core clause
Same crosswalk topicNIST AI RMF MANAGE 4, MANAGE 4.3, MANAGE 2.4, GOVERN 4.3Core clause
Same crosswalk topicSingapore Agentic Agentic 2.3.3Core clause
Same crosswalk topicSingapore GenAI GenAI 4Core clause
Same crosswalk topicTC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 5.3.7, TC260 5.3.18, TC260 App. 2 II.6Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7Related clause

Patterns that build it

The same topic in other frameworks

From the topic crosswalk: the clauses filed under the same topics as this one. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.

Incident response and monitoring

Open controls that evidence it

Draft controls in the open control profiles that map to this row: each states a requirement and the evidence it must leave behind.

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 73: serious-incident reporting (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 73: serious-incident reporting (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}