The route by which a person affected by an automated decision reaches a reviewer who did not take the original decision, sees the inputs, the reasons and the person's representations, and can change the outcome, with the result written back to the decision record. It is how the right to contest in GDPR Article 22(3) is honoured in practice 1.
- Developed in
- ch. 19, GDPR Article 22 after SCHUFA
ch. 05, Pattern: Decision Notice & Contest Path - Chapters
- ch. 05, Patterns · ch. 19, Privacy & AI · ch. 22, Principles & Standards
- Contrast with
- Contestability
- Source
- 1 numbered reference, listed below
Where it is used
4 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 05 · Patterns Pattern: Decision Notice & Contest Path 1 mention
- 08 · Regulatory Map Other jurisdictions 1 mention
- 19 · Privacy & AI Automated decision-making 4 mentions
- 22 · Principles & Standards Council of Europe Framework Convention (CETS No. 225) 1 mention
Patterns that use this term
4 pattern pages use the term, most mentions first.
- Decision Notice & Contest Path 6 mentions
- Drift & Fairness Monitor 2 mentions
- Disclosure & Notification Pipeline 2 mentions
- Rights Requests Against Models 1 mention
Related terms
Sources
- [1] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) (Arts. 4(1), 4(5), 4(7), 4(8), 4(12), 4(14), 5, 6, 9, 12(3), 22, 25, 28(2) and 28(4), 30, 33, 35; Recital 26). Publications Office of the EU (EUR-Lex). 2016-04-27. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng (verified: primary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .