The ability of a person affected by an AI-supported decision to challenge it and obtain a response that can change it. GDPR Article 22(3) gives a right to contest solely automated decisions 1, and the OECD principles ask that people adversely affected can challenge an output 2.
- Developed in
- ch. 16, The legal hooks for explanations
ch. 05, Pattern: Decision Notice & Contest Path - Chapters
- ch. 05, Patterns · ch. 12, Governance Program · ch. 16, Fairness & XAI
- Contrast with
- Recourse · Contest path
- Source
- 2 numbered references, listed below
Where it is used
2 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 21 · AI Laws Worldwide United Kingdom: principles, regulators and public-sector records 1 mention
- 22 · Principles & Standards The instruments at a glance 1 mention
Related terms
Sources
- [1] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) (Arts. 4(1), 4(5), 4(7), 4(8), 4(12), 4(14), 5, 6, 9, 12(3), 22, 25, 28(2) and 28(4), 30, 33, 35; Recital 26). Publications Office of the EU (EUR-Lex). 2016-04-27. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng (verified: primary)
- [2] Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, OECD/LEGAL/0449 (adopted 22 May 2019; AI-system definition revised 8 Nov 2023; revised 3 May 2024; five principles and five recommendations; 1.3 enables people adversely affected to challenge an output; definitions of AI system, lifecycle and AI actors). OECD. 2024-05-03. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449 (verified: primary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .