EU AI Act Art. 6: classification of high-risk AI systems (incl. the Annex III route)

Classification rules for high-risk AI systems, incl. the Annex III (standalone) route and Annex I (safety-component) route

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 6 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI ActArt. 6Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefactRisk-tiering ascodeLayersLayer 01Layer 02Evidence recordClassificationdecision record+2 moreSame topic in 11 frameworks (17 clauses): EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, China Algo. Rec., China Deep Synthesis,China GenAI Measures, UK ATRS and 4 moreAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 6 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 6Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefactRisk-tiering as codeLayersLayer 01Layer 02Evidence recordClassification decision record · +2…Same topic in 11 frameworks (17 clauses): EUAI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, China Algo.Rec., China Deep Synthesis and 6 moreAs of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART6. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 6.
  • Duty holder: Provider.
  • Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
  • Artefact: Risk-tiering as code.
  • Layers: Layer 01, Layer 02.
  • Evidence record: Classification decision record, +2 more.
  • Record schemas: Classification decision record , AI system register entry , Use-case record .
  • The same topic in 11 other frameworks; the crosswalk section below links each clause.
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART6
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 6
Duty holder
Provider
Authority
National MSA
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III
Later dates
  • The Annex I (safety-component) route applies
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

Risk-tiering as code; high-risk classification decision record; register entry flagging Annex III status.

Patterns that build it

The same topic in other frameworks

From the topic crosswalk: the clauses filed under the same topics as this one. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 6: classification of high-risk AI systems (incl. the Annex III route) (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART6). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art6. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 6: classification of high-risk AI systems (incl. the Annex III route) (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART6)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art6},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}