EU AI Act Art. 26(2): human oversight assigned to persons with competence, training and authority

Deployers assign human oversight to natural persons with the necessary competence, training and authority, and the necessary support

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 26(2) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: EU AI Act (post-Omnibus), Art. 26(2)ClauseEU AI ActArt. 26Duty holder: DeployerDuty holderDeployerApplies from: 2027-12-02 (Deferred)Applies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefact: Oversight assignment in the registry; role-based training records with expiry; approver roster per checkpoint class with authority to pause or refuseArtefactOversightassignment…Layers: Layer 01 Govern-as-Code and Layer 04 Runtime Controls & ObservabilityLayersLayer 01Layer 04Evidence record: Training record, Deployment decision record, Vendor due-diligence response, Agent register entry, AI system register entry, Instructions for use, AI incident record, Decommissioning runbookEvidence recordTraining record+7 moreSame topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topic files this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 26(2) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: EU AI Act (post-Omnibus), Art. 26(2)ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 26Duty holder: DeployerDuty holderDeployerApplies from: 2027-12-02 (Deferred)Applies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefact: Oversight assignment in the registry; role-based training records with expiry; approver roster per checkpoint class with authority to pause or refuseArtefactOversight assignment…Layers: Layer 01 Govern-as-Code and Layer 04 Runtime Controls & ObservabilityLayersLayer 01Layer 04Evidence record: Training record, Deployment decision record, Vendor due-diligence response, Agent register entry, AI system register entry, Instructions for use, AI incident record, Decommissioning runbookEvidence recordTraining record · +7 moreSame topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topicfiles this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
When this obligation applies3 dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2 on a time axis, against its review date 2026-09-24.2024202620282030As of 2026-09-242027-12-02 · DeferredAnnex III2028-08-02 · High-risk(Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded(product safety-component)systems2030-08-02 · Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risksystems intended for use bypublic authorities (Art.111(2))2027-12-02 · Deferred · Annex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I) · Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems2030-08-02 · Later step · Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))Source: Obligation register(chapter 08)
When this obligation applies3 dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2 on a time axis, against its review date 2026-09-24.2027-12-02 · DeferredAnnex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded(product safety-component)systems2030-08-02 · Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risksystems intended for use by publicauthorities (Art. 111(2))2024202620282030As of 2026-09-242027-12-02 · Deferred · Annex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I) · Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems2030-08-02 · Later step · Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))Source: Obligation register (chapter 08)
When this obligation applies The first date in the row's status, then each later step: filled once its date has passed, outlined while it is still ahead of the review date.
Data table: the dates
Dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2
DateStepDetail
2027-12-02DeferredAnnex III
2028-08-02High-risk (Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
2030-08-02Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 26(2)
Duty holder
Deployer
Authority
National MSA
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III
Later dates
  • Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
  • Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

Oversight assignment in the registry; role-based training records with expiry; approver roster per checkpoint class with authority to pause or refuse.

What this obligation connects to Solid edges are direct relations, dashed ones looser (a case that cites the same article, a framework whose clauses only touch the topic); patterns and controls take the colour of their stack layer. Select a node to open it; the lists below give every relation in full.
Data table: every relation
Relations of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2
FamilyItemRelation
PatternsDeactivation, Localisation & Retirement RunbookDirect
PatternsDecision Notice & Contest PathDirect
PatternsDisclosure & Notification PipelineDirect
PatternsDrift & Fairness MonitorDirect
PatternsExplanation ArtefactDirect
PatternsRights Requests Against ModelsDirect
PatternsStaged Rollout with Rollback CriteriaDirect
PatternsVendor / Model Due-Diligence GateDirect
Open controlsAIGE-CTL-DEPLOY-003 Oversight by trained people with authority to stopDirect

Patterns that build it

Open controls that evidence it

Draft controls in the open control profiles that map to this row: each states a requirement and the evidence it must leave behind.

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 26(2): human oversight assigned to persons with competence, training and authority (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art26-2. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 26(2): human oversight assigned to persons with competence, training and authority (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART26-2)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art26-2},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}