EU AI Act Art. 15(4): feedback loops in systems that continue to learn

Systems that continue to learn after placing on the market are built to eliminate or reduce the risk of biased outputs feeding future inputs (feedback loops), with mitigation measures

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 15(4) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI ActArt. 15Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefactFeedback-loopfairness…LayersLayer 03Layer 04Evidence recordEval result+4 moreSame topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topic files this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 15(4) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 15Duty holderProviderApplies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefactFeedback-loop fairness monitorLayersLayer 03Layer 04Evidence recordEval result · +4 moreSame topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topicfiles this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART15-4. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 15.
  • Duty holder: Provider.
  • Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
  • Artefact: Feedback-loop fairness monitor.
  • Layers: Layer 03, Layer 04.
  • Evidence record: Eval result, +4 more.
  • Record schemas: Eval result , Control observation , Test plan , Test report , Design record .
  • No crosswalk topic files this clause yet.
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART15-4
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 15(4)
Duty holder
Provider
Authority
National MSA
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III
Later dates
  • Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
  • Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

Feedback-loop fairness monitor; retraining-data bias check; agent memory write gate with provenance and rollback to a known-good snapshot.

Patterns that build it

Open controls that evidence it

Draft controls in the open control profiles that map to this row: each states a requirement and the evidence it must leave behind.

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 15(4): feedback loops in systems that continue to learn (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART15-4). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art15-4. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 15(4): feedback loops in systems that continue to learn (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART15-4)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art15-4},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}