AI Governance Engineer
GitHub

Minnesota CDPA: right to question the result of profiling

A consumer may question the result of profiling, be told the reason, review the personal data used, correct it and have the decision re-evaluated

By Reviewed

From clause to evidenceThe chain from Minnesota CDPA § 325M.14, subd. 1(g) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseMinnesota CDPA§ 325M.14,subd. 1Duty holderControllersApplies from2025-07-31In forceArtefactReason-and-reviewworkflow with…LayersLayer 04Layer 05Evidence recordEvidence recordv1Same topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topic files this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from Minnesota CDPA § 325M.14, subd. 1(g) to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.ClauseMinnesota CDPA · § 325M.14, subd. 1Duty holderControllersApplies from2025-07-31 · In forceArtefactReason-and-review workflow with…LayersLayer 04Layer 05Evidence recordEvidence record v1Same topic elsewhere: no crosswalk topicfiles this clause yetAs of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-USMN-MCDPA. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: Minnesota CDPA, § 325M.14, subd. 1.
  • Duty holder: Controllers.
  • Applies from: 2025-07-31, In force.
  • Artefact: Reason-and-review workflow with re-evaluation….
  • Layers: Layer 04, Layer 05.
  • Evidence record: Evidence record v1.
  • Record schema: Evidence record.
  • No crosswalk topic files this clause yet.
Id
AIGE-OBL-USMN-MCDPA
Instrument
Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act law
Clause
§ 325M.14, subd. 1(g)
In scope
Controllers
Authority
Attorney General
Applies from
In force

The artefact that evidences it

Reason-and-review workflow with re-evaluation on corrected data.

Patterns that build it

No pattern in the catalogue names this clause on its "Maps to" line yet; the artefact above is the engineering answer.

Source

Chapter 08, section State privacy and sector laws, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). Minnesota CDPA: right to question the result of profiling (AIGE-OBL-USMN-MCDPA). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-usmn-mcdpa. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{Minnesota CDPA: right to question the result of profiling (AIGE-OBL-USMN-MCDPA)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-usmn-mcdpa},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}