A banner used by other people's frameworks, notably the EU High-Level Expert Group 1 and NIST, whose seven trustworthy characteristics make it concrete 2. This book cites it rather than adopting it: the discipline is measured by realised risk reduction and evidence, not by the label.
- Developed in
- ch. 22, EU HLEG guidelines and ALTAI
- Chapters
- ch. 01, Definition · ch. 22, Principles & Standards
- Contrast with
- AI governance engineering · Responsible-AI principle set
- Source
- 2 numbered references, listed below
Where it is used
4 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 10 · Reading List Papers (machine-readable evidence and agent governance) 2 mentions
- 11 · AI Defined Responsible-AI principle sets, engineered 2 mentions
- 16 · Fairness & XAI How to read this chapter 1 mention
- 22 · Principles & Standards OECD AI Principles 6 mentions
Related terms
Sources
- [1] Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (four ethical principles; seven requirements; human-in-the-loop, human-on-the-loop and human-in-command oversight). High-Level Expert Group on AI / European Commission. 2019-04-08. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (verified: primary)
- [2] Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 100-1 (risk tolerance and residual risk; seven trustworthy characteristics; transparency answers "what happened", explainability "how", interpretability "why"; MAP 1.1 intended purposes; MANAGE 1.1 go/no-go determination; profiles). NIST. 2023-01-26. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 (verified: primary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .