In NIST's framing, the meaning of a system's output in the context of its purpose: why a decision was made and what it means to the user 1. An inherently interpretable model, such as a scorecard or a shallow tree, is its own explanation.
- Developed in
- ch. 16, Transparency, interpretability and explainability
ch. 16, Interpretable by design or explained after the fact - Chapters
- ch. 16, Fairness & XAI
- Contrast with
- Explainability
- Source
- 1 numbered reference, listed below
Where it is used
4 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 10 · Reading List Canonical papers: measurement, fairness and evaluation 1 mention
- 11 · AI Defined Eight characteristics that break classic IT governance 4 mentions
- 14 · Development Testing and validation 2 mentions
- 16 · Fairness & XAI Transparency, interpretability and explainability 4 mentions
Related terms
Sources
- [1] Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 100-1 (risk tolerance and residual risk; seven trustworthy characteristics; transparency answers "what happened", explainability "how", interpretability "why"; MAP 1.1 intended purposes; MANAGE 1.1 go/no-go determination; profiles). NIST. 2023-01-26. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 (verified: primary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .