The oversight mode in which a person can intervene in the design cycle and monitors the system's operation, rather than approving each decision 1. The system acts; people watch the signals and can stop it, so the stop path and the alerting are what must be tested.
- Developed in
- ch. 11, From definition element to registry field
- Chapters
- ch. 11, AI Defined
- Contrast with
- Human-in-the-loop (HITL) · Human-in-command (HIC)
- Source
- 1 numbered reference, listed below
Commonly confused
Human-in-the-loop (HITL) versus Human-on-the-loop (HOTL)
- Human-in-the-loop (HITL)
- The oversight mode in which a person can intervene in every decision cycle of an AI system; in engineering terms, a gate that holds each consequential action until a named approver decides, logging…
- Human-on-the-loop (HOTL)
- The oversight mode in which a person can intervene in the design cycle and monitors the system's operation, rather than approving each decision.
The differenceA person approves each consequential decision, against a person monitors and can stop the system.
Why it mattersHITL is evidenced by approval logs and override rates; HOTL by alerting and a tested stop path.
Where it is used
3 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 11 · AI Defined From definition element to registry field 2 mentions
- 14 · Development Design review 1 mention
- 22 · Principles & Standards EU HLEG guidelines and ALTAI 1 mention
Related terms
Sources
- [1] Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (four ethical principles; seven requirements; human-in-the-loop, human-on-the-loop and human-in-command oversight). High-Level Expert Group on AI / European Commission. 2019-04-08. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (verified: primary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .