An actor that fine-tunes or modifies another provider's general-purpose AI model. The Commission's guidelines make it the modified model's provider only when the modification uses over a third of the original training compute; its Art. 53(1) duties then cover the modification, but a modified systemic-risk model is presumed to keep that risk and its duties 12.
- Developed in
- ch. 15, When a deployer becomes a provider
ch. 18, When a fine-tuner becomes a GPAI provider - Chapters
- ch. 15, Deployment · ch. 18, EU AI Act
- Contrast with
- Downstream provider
- Source
- 2 numbered references, listed below
Where it is used
2 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 14 · Development The technical file 1 mention
- 17 · Incidents The response lifecycle 1 mention
Related terms
Sources
- [1] Guidelines on obligations for general-purpose AI providers, FAQ (a modifier becomes a provider only when the modification uses more than one third of the original model's training compute; obligations limited to the modification). European Commission. 2025. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/guidelines-obligations-general-purpose-ai-providers (verified: primary)
- [2] Commission Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models (content approved 18 July 2025 by C(2025) 5045 final; formal text C(2025) 7719 final of 19 Nov 2025; paras. 65 to 68 on modifiers; non-binding; indicative criterion of training compute above 10^23 FLOP with the ability to generate language, images or video). European Commission. 2025-11-19. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/guidelines-scope-obligations-providers-general-purpose-ai-models-under-ai-act (verified: primary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .