A facially neutral practice that falls harder on a protected group. Under US Title VII the employer must show the practice is job related and consistent with business necessity, and loses if it refuses a less discriminatory alternative 1. The EU counterpart is indirect discrimination.
- Developed in
- ch. 16, Disparate treatment and disparate impact
ch. 20, Disparate treatment, disparate impact and proxies - Chapters
- ch. 16, Fairness & XAI · ch. 20, Existing Law
- Contrast with
- Disparate treatment · Indirect discrimination
- Source
- 1 numbered reference, listed below
Where it is used
3 chapters of the Body of Knowledge use the term. Each link opens the first section that does.
- 08 · Regulatory Map US federal and state laws 2 mentions
- 16 · Fairness & XAI Disparate treatment and disparate impact 5 mentions
- 20 · Existing Law Non-discrimination 3 mentions
Sources
- [1] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (Title VII: unlawful employment practices; 2000e-2(k) burden of proof in disparate-impact cases, business necessity and less discriminatory alternatives). Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. 2026. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000e-2 (verified: secondary)
Definitions of legal terms paraphrase the cited text, which governs. Dated statements are as of .