Pattern: AIBOM
An AI bill of materials emitted at build, recording models, datasets, weights and their provenance in a standard format beside the registry entry.
One working control on the engineering side of AI governance.
Summary: Generate an AI bill of materials at build for each AI system, recording models, datasets, weights and their provenance in a standard format, and store it with the registry entry. The AIBOM is what the transparency and eval layers read to know what to document and what to test.
Objectives
Make the composition and provenance of an AI system machine-readable, so supply-chain risk and transparency obligations can be answered from an artefact, not reconstructed.
Target users
AI governance engineer, ML engineer, security engineer.
Impacted stakeholders
Model owners, downstream deployers, auditors, procurement.
Relevant principles
Instrument the build to produce its own proof; start from a named failure mode or harm.
Context
AI systems assembled from foundation models, fine-tunes, third-party datasets and libraries, where the classic SBOM captures software dependencies but not models or data.
Problem
Without a bill of materials for models and data, an organisation cannot answer which model version, from which provenance, trained on which data, is inside a given system, so it cannot assess supply-chain risk or produce transparency documentation on demand.
Solution
Emit an AIBOM at build in a standard format, CycloneDX ML-BOM or the SPDX 3.0 AI profile, for example with the OWASP AIBOM generator 1 (illustrative), covering models, datasets, weights, and their provenance and licences. Attach it to the registry entry and regenerate it on each build so it never drifts from the deployed system.
Consequences
Supply-chain and provenance questions become queries; transparency documents can be generated from the AIBOM. The cost is toolchain integration and keeping provenance metadata accurate.
Related patterns
Agent Registry; Model Card as Control Evidence; Machine-Readable Evidence (OSCAL).
Maps to: EU AI Act Art. 11, Art. 53 (GPAI documentation) · ISO/IEC 42001 · NIST AI RMF (Map) · CSA AICM · Layer 02 Inventory & Transparency.
Function labels follow the NIST AI RMF2. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.
Sources
- [1] “Evolving AI Transparency: the AIBOM generator’s new home at OWASP” (CycloneDX output). OWASP GenAI Security Project. 2025-12-18. https://genai.owasp.org/2025/12/18/evolving-ai-transparency-the-journey-of-the-aibom-generator-and-its-new-home-at-owasp/ (verified: primary)
- [2] AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0; Govern, Map, Measure, Manage). NIST. 2023-01-26. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework (verified: primary)